ThyDarkAngel wrote:Colour me impressed!!
Damn... Pity games don't evolve as fast as tech does...
I want more and better games announced for this console.
Nintendo is already owned, by a long shot, still let' see if that reflects on sales. We all know the best is not always the best selling, sadly.
How? Theres about 6 tentative games announced for it in general, many of them extensions of console games. No matter how you look at it, its not going to be less expensive then 3DS and just because it has ps3 dev tools, ps3 development is still expensive and it launches at the end of the year.
Console/handheld wars are fought with software. Yea an Uncharted on handheld is tempting, is it worth looking past solid 1st party support? or the quirky 3rd part stuff we all enjoy.
As it stands the situation is the same as it was 6 years ago. but with two different players.
Clint wrote:No, tech means nothing to you. It means a lot to me, especially when considering buying a console. Which isn't cheap these days.
That's the difference between you and me, I want the best tech available as it gives me the best gaming experience. I'm not much of a handheld gamer, but it's hard to look past this NGP and not be amazed. I believe games these days need the top graphics, gameplay and emotion. We are getting very close to nailing facial animation and replicating realistic environments.
Now looking at both handhelds, I would choose the NGP purely on a technical standpoint. And I would absolutely say the same if both handhelds switched brands.
As for your FPS comment, you are forgetting that this handheld can (apparantly) emulate that of the current-gen home console. If you think that falls in comparison with the DS/PSP era then you're sadly mistaken. This is now something else entirely and FPS games are (unfortunately) where the money lies. It's just a matter of them taking off on a handheld - which will surely be possible now, given the high-spec.
FPS wasn't exactly booming back on the PS2/XBox/DS/PSP era. I'm sure this time things will change.
And your opinion on the 'best handheld' means nothing to me. I'm not a handheld gamer and I don't know why you're even mentioning this. We like different games, different consoles and disagree on almost everything. Saying one is better than the other isn't necessarily true. It would surely be dependant on the gamers personal taste. You speak of the past like it makes all the difference. Fuck the past, i'm talking about the future here.
I dunno about you but in the 20 years I've been playing games I go with software not tech, thats what really sells a system and in the end is the important part. A console can tell you that secret of the universe is 42, if it has no games its little more then a paperweight.
Now back in 2005 the Ps2 was most gamers console of choice and the PSP was able to make good on the same types of games. The Ps3 was still 2 years off, and the PSP was the most advanced thing anyone had ever seen, yet the handheld that was slightly more powerful then a last gen console still won out. The FPS was on the rise, back then Halo was setting records and one of the things Sony was hyping was its FPS selection at launch which included Coded Arms.
The past gives us clues to the future, by studying how things react we can appropriately measure their response to our actions. If in over 20 years the same situation crops up and over those 20 years has the same outcome, then its understandable if people draw certain conclusions.
You both have your points but as it stands we need to wait and see