Rikitatsu wrote:I was trying hard not to delve into specifics the first time around, but people kinda freaked out, which I guess is to be expected, hence my clarified post. In hindsight, I should've probably posted nothing in the first place.
Basically, yeah.
Rikitatsu wrote:I don't think commenting on whether or not the game is earlier in development than most of us thought would break anyone's NDAs. Can they refute/confirm anything in detail? Probably not... But they can quote me and say "This is Bullshit".
There are no NDAs, if the Japan dinner is any example. The real burden is the trust from the devs to the backers at the dinner, and then the people who they've told the information to, who may have passed it on again on the down-low. But I guess once the word starts spreading it's hard to keep a lid on it.
I will say that based on roughly the same information you have, calling it "earlier than we thought" is a stretch. It is where YSnet says it is, where the work flow chart says it is, where Update 63 says it is, where Ryan Payton says it is. Prototype heading into full production.
A game doesn't even look like a game for a very long time, but it's a big stride in the right direction when you begin to see the game emerging from ideas, assets, and mechanics.
2017 is gonna be cool.