mue 26 wrote:I completely agree. And I never said tackling those social issues was unrealistic, I was simply questioning how long it might take, as I believe it will take the US a hell of a lot of time and soul searching before such issues are moved significantly closer towards eradication. Hence why I think in the interim it would save a hell of a lot of lives if guns were harder to come by. Even lan di-sama, who I know from previous debates enjoys his firearms, seems to want regulation tightened up.
mue 26 wrote:But this only proves my point further. Making guns very easily accessible to a nation of people that have a proven record of handling them in a especially irresponsible manner, is madness. As I said, if society in the States gets toward the point where people are looking like they might actually not want to shoot each other, give them whatever they want!
Sonikku wrote: Why is it when people talk gun control everyone always thinks in terms of two extremes?
beedle wrote:um... got a source? for either of those points.
redline wrote:in america when a prison is full, they dont start issuing lighter sentences & release people early with the hope they will be "good", they just build another prison..
beedle wrote:
I never said laws shouldn't be tightened? I'm not sure where you got that from. I'm simply saying there are bigger issues to tackle, that will do far more than a simple short term "tighten regulation" law. It's a societal issue, little else.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Powered by phpBB © 2000-