Sonikku wrote:The lightsaber design is not at all practical when you consider the gyrodynamic strength of dueling with the weapon, but who freakin' cares.
OL wrote: I'm not a fan of the fancy camera work on the Falcon reveal; one of the beautiful things about the original trilogy is how simply-shot it is, which helped in making their space battle scenes memorable. When the camera work is too fancy, it loses memorability. Kinda makes me think of a scene or two from Sucker Punch, where the camera is swooping and turning and spinning so much that the action gets completely lost in the movement of the cinematography. So I don't personally like that shot much.
Sonikku wrote:The lightsaber design is not at all practical when you consider the gyrodynamic strength of dueling with the weapon, but who freakin' cares.
YES. Exactly.
I foresee a shit-ton of griping about little things like that in these upcoming movies; there are so many fans out there that you'll simply never be able to please. Not to mention that internet society is obsessed with ripping things to shreds if they "don't make sense."
I say fuck it, it's a space opera, I couldn't give two shits about realism or practicality. Does anyone really love Star Wars specifically for how practical it is? That just seems silly to me. It's one big fantasy.
Kenny wrote:But if we're gonna pull the whole "it's a big fantasy" card, might as well make everyone fly and ride fire breathing talking dragons straight into a Death Star core cause...why not?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Powered by phpBB © 2000-