This reminds of me of the debate that emerged when Nintendo started trying to take footage of their copyrighted video games down left right and center a couple of years ago and became known for being particularly zealous about it. The question then became the extent to which the Youtuber's gameplay and commentary were 'original work' on top of the copyrighted material.
I mean after all, it was about approach; you can consider that a famous youtuber that people appreciate playing your game can help with promoting and generating hype among thousands of subscribers (like how Sony bought Twitch and integrated it into the PS4), or you can consider that you want people to buy your game rather than just watching the whole thing on Youtube (Nintendo).
If it's just footage without commentary for the "TellTale" type games, I might as well be watching a movie. Those of us who have played Shenmue II knows what happens, having commentary from a Youtuber you like is like watching a friend play the game and chipping in with his opinion (except you can't correct him when he's full of shit!
). I don't mind it.
Having said that though I accept Shenmue is a Dreamcast game and, like other old games, not everyone can run emulators and some people just want to see the game in action. I suppose I can accept that its not as easy to just 'get the game yourself'. Still, I think its valuable to get the gist of the game from someone who actually knows something about the game and can play it properly (unlike Funhaus and Van Ord). For example Gametrailers playing through the whole of Shenmue II was brilliant.
EDIT:
It gives me a different perspective on a game like Shenmue II that I've beaten several times.
Agreed. The one thing I'd forgotten in all these years was the process of figuring things out on that first playthrough. Fascinating stuff.