Bambi wrote:
Which one are you?
I tend to go against the tide sometimes. But from an economic perspective, manufacturing too much merchandise and not working on expanding the actual game budget can cause a bit of an issue. We have to remember that about a quarter of that budget is going to merchandise (that's close to a million dollars as of this post). I fear it's a dangerous distraction. It would be like purchasing a web domain at premium price, coding the pages to maximum allowance on the server, and then not selling what you intended--- all whilst paying the taxes and fees to keep your domain live. So in this business model, what you are really doing is polishing the advertisement, but you have no product output, and you're paying top dollar for terminal fees, security, hosting, manufacturing costs, insurance, and payroll division. But this is just an
extreme hypothetical example to be taken with a grain of salt. Therefore, my argument is partially rendered invalid since we still have approximately 75% allocated to the actual game development.
I know I am in the extreme minority here, but I did find that they addressed all of my concerns. I do agree
somewhat on everyone's criticism of their public relations team. But we do have to bear in mind that they do not belong to a sizable corporation like Google, where there are huge conglomerates of specialized customer service representatives for different companies e.g.: Youtube, Blogger, etc. From what I understand, they seem fairly small; from this I can only assume one thing:
Their services are affordable. If it were the same PR team for Mercedes Benz (which is a large, internationally renowned company with return buyers) for example, it would be an extravagant waste of funding to support a Kickstarter community of ~50,000 with a profile demographic of 24-45 year old "retro gamers" that are most likely male with low-to-median income and a household size of approximately 3-4 members. I do not want to venture into saying that we are a niche variety, but Suzuki has to be very conservative and conscientious. His burden is to understand how to whet investors' appetites (I do not want to discuss binding contracts and legal colloquy to further express my point as to why they are to remain anonymous) and still manage to gain support from the incumbent community. A very daunting task, but he handles it with grace.