Ok i give up with you, no where did i say the amount of people we have there contributes to the amount of medals in fact i've been saying exactly the opposite i even told you this and you said we were saying the same thing then and now you're just focusing on something I didn't even say, your lack of comprehension is amazing, either you're fucking with me or you're cleverbot because this lack of comprehension isn't possible from a human, I hope you're just reading too fast because you're on your phone because basically this thread is:
SC: apples are red
NM: no they're not they're red
SC: yeah that's what I said
NM:no it's not
SC:
apples are red
NM: oh ok I thought the opposite"changes subject, talks about increase in numbers"
SC: the increase is because...
NM: STOP SAYING APPLES AREN'T RED
I explained to you the situation in a much simpler way so that hopefully it can help you in future interactions with people
oh and no what you're saying isn't even speculation because you have absolutely nothing to back you up (THIS IS ABOUT THE NUMBER OF ATHLETES GETTING A FREE PASS NOT ABOUT THE NUMBER OF MEDALS, IS THAT CLEAR?) while I do, in the past 50 years the most athletes we sent to the olympic games was 371 in 1992, the rest being between 250-310 on average except for 1988 with 340, and when we host at home where people get free passes we have an increase of over 200 athletes on our team, so yes it's speculation but I do believe that this increase in numbers in our team is due to free passes so I don't believe the vast majority of the GB team were at the olympics were there by their own right like you were saying, this has nothing to do with medals, at this point medals are completely irrelevant to the conversation
just to quote what I was answering in the hopes you don't answer this with some irrelevant off topic argument about medal count like you have done in every post before
I would like to think the vast majority were there by right.
source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Brit ... r_Olympics