This is also why many young western men become fans of anime and east Asian games, culture, etc. For example, Japanese culture has not been subjected to as much arbitrary alteration as in the west, so western males find eastern females to be more natural, more feminine, and, quite frankly, therefore, less abrasive.
mue 26 wrote: that's how Boxers are supposed to look. I truly hate all this dogmatic idiocy.
mue 26 wrote:This is also why many young western men become fans of anime and east Asian games, culture, etc. For example, Japanese culture has not been subjected to as much arbitrary alteration as in the west, so western males find eastern females to be more natural, more feminine, and, quite frankly, therefore, less abrasive.
I disagree with nearly everything you have written here. Firstly Japan has been subject to vast influence and alteration from the west, what planet are you living on? Secondly, the things I dislike most about Japan are the dogmatic aspects of it's society. I sometimes think that Japan, in a way, got the worst of both worlds. The modernising influence the west has caused modern Japan to lose connection with or just forget much of the truly beneficial ancient knowledge that was inherent over there, but frustratingly, at the same time Japan has insisted on clinging on to many completely pointless dogmatic practises which serve no helpful purpose. OK, so this isn't entirely fair of me, as there are some examples of the opposite being true too, and I'm certainly being a tad judgemental. But still.
mue 26 wrote:Because lets face it, most parents aren't making that call due to the supposed argument of hygiene, it comes down to ridiculous religious dogma.
OL wrote:mue 26 wrote:Because lets face it, most parents aren't making that call due to the supposed argument of hygiene, it comes down to ridiculous religious dogma.
Not at all. It generally happens because of the hygiene issue, in the US at least. I'd say most American males do get circumcised, and most American males aren't even part of a religion that requires it.
It's not as if it's a barbaric practice anyway. Most doctors will tell you that the baby can't even feel it. And even if they can, pain is only detrimental if the person will remember it. It's not like anyone is being emotional scarred by being circumcised.
I see absolutely no reason how any of this is harmful or unfair toward the child.
It's not like later in life they're going to longingly miss their foreskin.
...and having typed that last sentence, I now see how ridiculous this conversation is to begin with.
Bye!
Absentia wrote:With that kind of argument, why is it so wrong to do this?
EDIT: OL's argument, that is
Ryudo wrote: It's a health risk for Urinary infections and HIV so it's recommended that it be done for less risk for those and other major infections diseases.
Yeah I would want the best health possible for my child and have it done by doctors.
Ryudo wrote:We also don't worry about smegma
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Powered by phpBB © 2000-