^ She looks about 12
Strikeout wrote: circumcision in jewish and islamic religion, no one have the right to hurt a young baby except it is needed (medical reasons)
no i'm no racist but this is not correct.
It's a good thing your not German or else I'd have to question your sentiments on Semitism...oh....shit...
Sorry for the bad joke
, but your decision to preemptively declare your not a Nazi in a previous thread made this hard to resist....we're not being had are we...?
But seriously, on that point I completely agree with you. It doesn't quite seem fair to force circumcision on a unwitting baby. Seriously, it's now illegal to dock the tails or crop the ears of dogs in the UK...why is not illegal to dock the foreskin of innocent unconsenting babies!?
I don't understand how you, or anyone, is taking that for granted. The phrase implies that there is a deserved appreciation that whatever the subject at hand maybe, is not getting from you or whoever.
Seriously, this thread has just made me realize how long I've taken the forced dressed code of female public servants for granted. Good shit it is. In fact I've now become disgusted by the realisation that our female police officers don't also have to wear skirts. Take those pants off woman!
(Pardon my misogynistic humour Sonikku..and any other female lurkers we may have)
I find the very definition of what is "smart" attire to be outdated. There's just no need for the shirt and tie combo to exist in the 21st century. It's one of those things that each generation inherits and accepts as normal because everyone else is doing it, despite its increasingly apparent absurdity. Maybe I'll start a petition myself.
This a million times. But I'd probably go a little further and suggest that any kind of "smart" dress code is entirely foolish. Why not let people wear whatever it is they want to wear for a day in the office, a job interview, or a date in court? It's ridiculous and completely shallow and irrelevant unless it's for any crucially practical reason. It's prejudice.