QWERTY™ wrote:I don't think calling people "fools", "cretins", "imbeciles" and "idiots" is the way to argue your point tbh mate, it's pretty offensive considering we're only giving our political opinion. No need for the off-key remarks.
Feelers Rebo wrote:Russia Today for a good perspective on who's responsible for what
beedle wrote:Feelers Rebo wrote:Russia Today for a good perspective on who's responsible for what
just seen this LOL
mue 26 wrote:Any links to this Russia Today thing, where can I check it?
mue 26 wrote:Therefore he needs not refer to any external sources on the topic.
beedle wrote: however i wish her family the best
beedle wrote:
RT was set up by mr. putin to promote a pro-Russian, anti-Western stance. It constantly downplays criticism of the corrupt, undemocratic Russian government (see: a strong lack of said criticisms), promotes Putin's foreign policy (see: its support of Assad in Syria) and is generally pretty conspiratorial and sensationalist about the U.S. politics(see: the whole site). RT makes no attempt at truthful journalism. It is literally propaganda straight from the Kremlin and there is a reason people view it as a joke. if you must read a foreign news outlet go for al jazeera or something.
also while i acknowledge that the BBC isn't perfect, I do find it amusing how the right constantly accuse it of being too left leaning and the left, vice versa. pretty funny really, at least i think so.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Powered by phpBB © 2000-